All four swatches were made. Each is 6.25" or 15.875 cm square; each prepared with the same sized yarn and needles or hook. It took 25 stitches to get the appropriate width for the knit swatches and only 20 stitches for both of the crocheted squares. That already says something, but I'll get to it in a minute. (Don't know what I'm talking about here? Check out this post first.)
Unfortunately, you'll just have to trust me that four swatches were prepared and that they were all the same size. In the excitement to get to measuring and weighing of the swatches, no photographic evidence was taken. Luckily for me the results of this research doesn't have to be reviewed by a jury of my peer. This blog post will be the sum and total of where this information is published.
What can be shared, however, are the balls of yarn rewound after the weighing and measuring was completed. You will note the size of the balls vary. Now one can argue that may be because they are hand wound, but I know which ball of yarn was used for which project and the size reflects the results.
Drum roll please--listed below are those results
Weight in Gms Length in Yards/Meters
Garter Knit 17.1 33.215/30.3718
Stockinette Knit 13.8 26.333/24.0789
Single Crochet 19.5 38.021/34.7664
Double Crochet 16.4 25.125/22.9743
So what conclusions can be drawn from this data.
But you don't have to take my word for it. Here's a link to another crafter's POV about the topic. She takes a slightly different approach looking at stitches per inch, but the conclusion remains the same. I believe the myth isn't totally busted, but its reliability can be called into question. The comparison is not a simple one to make.
Unfortunately, you'll just have to trust me that four swatches were prepared and that they were all the same size. In the excitement to get to measuring and weighing of the swatches, no photographic evidence was taken. Luckily for me the results of this research doesn't have to be reviewed by a jury of my peer. This blog post will be the sum and total of where this information is published.
The remains of my four swatches |
What can be shared, however, are the balls of yarn rewound after the weighing and measuring was completed. You will note the size of the balls vary. Now one can argue that may be because they are hand wound, but I know which ball of yarn was used for which project and the size reflects the results.
Drum roll please--listed below are those results
Weight in Gms Length in Yards/Meters
Garter Knit 17.1 33.215/30.3718
Stockinette Knit 13.8 26.333/24.0789
Single Crochet 19.5 38.021/34.7664
Double Crochet 16.4 25.125/22.9743
So what conclusions can be drawn from this data.
- First the garter knit stitch and the single crochet create the most dense and less drapey or flowy fabric. Thus they require more yarn. Or perhaps the reverse is more accurate, they use more yarn because they are more dense.
- The stockinette knit and double crochet stitches are less dense and create a fabric that is more flowy; thus they require less yarn to create.
- And as a secondary hypothesis, yes the garter stitch requires more yarn than the stockinette stitch to create the same sized swatch. In fact, it is approximately 20% more yarn.
- The garter and single crochet are the most similar type of fabric and the percentage difference in my little experiment is 12.3% by weight and 12.6% by length. (Since my weight and length measurements are done with rather unsophisticated instruments [a postage scale and yardstick], the difference in percentages can be expected.) Although these difference are roughly 12.5% that does not equal 33%.
- However, should one compare the stockinette stitch to single crochet, stitches that yield completely different types of fabric, the percentages jump up to this: weight is 29.2% and 30.7% for length. This difference gets much closer to 33% rule of thumb.
But you don't have to take my word for it. Here's a link to another crafter's POV about the topic. She takes a slightly different approach looking at stitches per inch, but the conclusion remains the same. I believe the myth isn't totally busted, but its reliability can be called into question. The comparison is not a simple one to make.
After being in relationship with Wilson for seven years,he broke up with me, I did everything possible to bring him back but all was in vain, I wanted him back so much because of the love I have for him, I begged him with everything, I made promises but he refused. I explained my problem to someone online and she suggested that I should contact a spell caster that could help me cast a spell to bring him back but I am the type that don’t believed in spell, I had no choice than to try it, I meant a spell caster called Dr Zuma zuk and I email him, and he told me there was no problem that everything will be okay before three days, that my ex will return to me before three days, he cast the spell and surprisingly in the second day, it was around 4pm. My ex called me, I was so surprised, I answered the call and all he said was that he was so sorry for everything that happened, that he wanted me to return to him, that he loves me so much. I was so happy and went to him, that was how we started living together happily again. Since then, I have made promise that anybody I know that have a relationship problem, I would be of help to such person by referring him or her to the only real and powerful spell caster who helped me with my own problem and who is different from all the fake ones out there. Anybody could need the help of the spell caster, his email: spiritualherbalisthealing@gmail.com or WhatsApp him +15068001647
ReplyDeleteyou can email him if you need his assistance in your relationship or anything. CONTACT HIM NOW FOR SOLUTION TO ALL YOUR PROBLEMS
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete